Queenie’s Law Aims to End the Agony of Cruel Animal Experiments in Michigan

In Michigan, a proposed legislation, known as Queenie’s Law (HB 4849), is stirring up a significant conversation about the ethical boundaries of animal research. Named after a dog who endured and ultimately succumbed to the rigors of scientific experiments at Wayne State University in Michigan, this bill seeks to prohibit painful experiments on dogs and cats at publicly funded institutions within the state.

Meredith Blanchard, head of policy for the National Anti-Vivisection Society, shed some light on the dark realities behind the laboratory doors, where animals undergo severe procedures for the sake of research.

“Queenie — this poor pup was an unwilling participant in tests that have been done for years on animals, mostly beagles,” Blanchard told the Animal Rescue Site.

Queenie's Law aims to prohibit painful experiments on dogs in Michigan.

Photo: Pexels
Queenie’s Law aims to prohibit painful experiments on dogs in Michigan.

The invasive procedures, as Blanchard outlines, involve “implanting medical devices into the dog’s chest cavity, and then making them run on treadmills until their hearts give out or until something happens to the device.”

Queenie’s story is not an isolated incident. For decades, similar experiments have continued without yielding substantial benefits for human patients. The narrative extends beyond Wayne State, with reports indicating that such practices are prevalent in various institutions across Michigan, impacting hundreds of animals annually, according to the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM).

“These painful tests on dogs are also happening in Northern Biomedical Research Incorporated, Michigan State University, Henry Ford Hospital, and Macomb Community College,” Blanchard says. “They all reported using dogs and painful experiments in 2021.”

Queenie's law seeks to protect dogs from invasive research procedures.

Photo: Pexels
Queenie’s law seeks to protect dogs from invasive research procedures.

Animal welfare and anti-cruelty laws are largely powerless to help these animals.

“Just about every, if not every single animal cruelty law at the state level exempts animals used for research,” Blanchard says.

This exemption has led to a lack of stringent oversight, with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs) often plagued by conflicts of interest, failing to protect these animals effectively.

“The oversight from IACUCs also oftentimes falls well short of what it says they should be doing on paper,” Blanchard points out, highlighting a systemic issue that Queenie’s Law seeks to address.

Queenie's law encourages the use of humane research alternatives.

Photo: Pexels
Queenie’s law encourages the use of humane research alternatives.

The debate around Queenie’s Law brings to the forefront a broader ethical question about the use of animals in research. Critics argue that such practices are necessary for medical advancements, while proponents of the law, including Blanchard and the PCRM, advocate for the development of alternative research methodologies that do not involve animal suffering. This stance is echoed by Ryan Merkley, Director of Research Advocacy for PCRM, who advocates for humane and relevant research models that align with contemporary ethical standards.

The push for Queenie’s Law is not merely a legislative battle; it is a reflection of societal values concerning the treatment of animals. The significant public support and advocacy for the bill highlight a growing consensus on the need for compassionate and ethical treatment of animals, extending beyond the confines of the research laboratory.

The proposed legislation, if passed, would not only save countless animals from unnecessary suffering but also set a precedent for other states to follow, potentially reshaping the landscape of animal research in the United States.

Queenie's law would ban the use of dogs in experiments causing pain or distress.

Photo: Pexels
Queenie’s law would ban the use of dogs in experiments causing pain or distress.

Blanchard’s vision for the future of research is clear: “We now need to focus on really fueling relevant research models to solve the health issues of today that humans are experiencing.”

Queenie’s Law represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing dialogue between science, ethics, and animal welfare. As the Michigan legislature considers this landmark bill, the outcome will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the future of animal research, challenging the scientific community to embrace more humane and innovative approaches to advancing human health.

Click below to support Queenie’s Law in Michigan and help us advocate for similar laws in all 50 states!

Pet Relocation or Financial Ruin? Owners Face Tough Choices During Moves: Click “Next” below!

Matthew Russell is a West Michigan native and with a background in journalism, data analysis, cartography and design thinking. He likes to learn new things and solve old problems whenever possible, and enjoys bicycling, spending time with his daughters, and coffee.
Whizzco for FAP