Inhumane Practices Still Raising Alarms At This Taxpayer-Funded Livestock Research Facility

Since it was first created in 1964, the United States Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC) has had a controversial relationship with animal rights and welfare.

Thousands of animals housed at USMARC facilities have been killed or died from other causes in the last few decades. Livestock at the facility have been specially bred to produce more offspring than normal, resulting in particularly weak and vulnerable progeny — those that survive often have debilitating deformities. Pigs are kept in four-foot-square pens, pregnant domesticated sheep are pushed into vast fields to fend for themselves, and cattle endure unusually brutal care.

Hundreds of animals die every year at the USMARCS facility in Kansas.

Hundreds of animals die every year at the USMARCS facility in Kansas.

Two years after the center opened, mass public outcry against animal cruelty resulted in the Animal Welfare Act — although farm animals used in research that promised to benefit agriculture remained exempt from protections. Research facilities such as USMARC, overseen by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), were expected to self-regulate. However, despite the Agriculture Department’s crack-downs on animal abuse at private research facilities, the publicly-funded USMARC labs are yet allowed to treat animals as they see fit.

The horrific truth of USMARC’s treatment of animals first came to light in 2015 in the New York Times. The article described indefensible acts that have taken place at MARC over the past several decades, and prompted the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) to ask former Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack for an immediate investigation with appropriate corrective action, including possible closure of the facility.

An investigative report found injuries to livestock went unreported often at the USMARC center.

An investigative report found injuries to livestock often went unreported at the USMARC center.

The AWI called on Congress to cut off the USMARC’s research funding, following the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Care report, which detailed multiple instances of direct non-compliant veterinary care and animal handling resulting in significant animal suffering.

“MARC is one of the most high profile cases of research on animals gone awry to date,” said Cathy Liss, AWI president. “Despite over two and a half years of adverse publicity and multiple site visits, the facility continues to severely mistreat the animals under its care. After the revelations about MARC surfaced in 2015, Congress sent a strong message that animal abuse at federal agencies will not be tolerated. We are now asking Congress to permanently revoke MARC’s funding and work toward closure of the facility.”

The USMARC facility focuses on animal testing to improve the bottom line of cattle farmers.

The USMARC facility focuses on animal testing to improve the bottom lines of cattle farmers.

The inspection details incidents of animal cruelty, including

  • an untreated lamb unable to bear weight on his right rear limb
  • two lame bovines who were left untreated
  • observed medical issues during the inspection that were not
  • documented nor conveyed to the attending veterinarian
  • several animals in the feedlot area showing symptoms of severe heat distress—including open mouth breathing with tongue protruding, excessive drooling, and increased respiratory rate
  • pigs who were lame and pigs who had sustained numerous, untreated fight wounds on their head, neck and bodies because no attempt was made to minimize aggression and competition during co-mingling

USDA in-house agricultural research receives a total of $1.2 billion annually from taxpayers. USMARC uses more than $22 million taxpayer dollars and 35,000 animals annually, focusing on science and technology to boost livestock industry profits. But it is clear the center’s cruelty has not paid off, and its attempts to improve agriculture through experimental research have caused a staggering increase in death-rates among livestock industry-wide.

Help us bring an end to this inhumane testing!

Help us bring an end to this inhumane testing!

A poll of Americans commissioned by the taxpayer watchdog White Coat Waste Project found that 68 percent of voters want to reduce taxpayer-funded research intended to benefit agribusiness.

Join the growing number of animal advocates like you in calling for an end to this inhumane research. Click below and make a difference!

We Have The Technology To Keep Millions Of Chicks From Slaughter, So Why Isn’t It Being Put To Use?: Click “Next” below!

Matthew Russell is a West Michigan native and with a background in journalism, data analysis, cartography and design thinking. He likes to learn new things and solve old problems whenever possible, and enjoys bicycling, going to the dog park, spending time with his daughter, and coffee.
Whizzco for FAP